Hello, could you explain to me in more detail the significance of the Robert Koch Institute’s COVID-19 leaks? Which aspects of them are problematic, and why?
Dear Simon
If your question is about whether the publication of the largely redacted RKI minutes has brought to light anything controversial or even scandalous regarding the management of the coronavirus pandemic in Germany: in my opinion, no. Rather, the minutes show that colleagues in Germany made recommendations to tackle the pandemic to the best of their knowledge and belief.
The minutes help us to understand the challenges faced by a panel of experts during a pandemic. What is supposedly controversial mainly concerns communication issues – but not the substantive assessments and recommended measures.
A few examples:
Firstly – the devil is in the detail. A key reason for the delay in making the minutes publicly available was the protection of personal data. Not all individuals named in the minutes had consented to the publication of their data.
Secondly – transparency is a valuable ally. Perhaps it would have been wiser to publish the minutes early on and as fully as possible. After all, apart from the general challenges of a pandemic, there is hardly anything truly controversial in them.
I hope I’ve been able to answer your question, even though I’ve focused more on why the leaks aren’t sensational.